Knowledge and justification
DOWNLOAD FREE
|
Pragmatism and religiion
Equations are omitted for technical reasons - download the original pdf
Some modern theorists, such as Quine, seek to use this theory of Pragmatism to complete the Positivist's desire for a clear demarcation between science and non-science. Such a demarcation would serve to show that all non-scientific notions can be rejected as untrue, since they cannot be assimilated into a coherent interpretation of experience. However, this application is not necessitated by Pragmatism as such. William James did not, himself, seek to eliminate religious hypotheses and entities as incapable of being fitted into a coherent and useful interpretation of life. This is made clear in the following extract. "Theism and materialism … point, when we take them prospectively, to wholly different outlooks of experience. For , according to the theory of mechanical evolution, the laws of redistribution of matter and motion, though they are certainly to thank for all the good hours which our organisms have every yielded us and for all the ideals which our minds now frame, are yet fatally certain to undo their work again, and to redissolve everything that they have once evolved…The notion of God, on the other hand, however inferior it may be in the clearness to those mathematical notions so current in mechanical philosophy, has at least this practical superiority over them, that it guarantees an ideal order that shall be permanently preserved." James regards the content of the notion of "God" as expressed in its practical consequences. It is a possible constituent of a future scientific theory. His pragmatic theory dissolves the boundary between science and metaphysics.
|
Contents of Knowledge and justification
1 The distinction between knowledge and belief 2 Unsound, invalid, possible world and fallacy 3 Counterexample, exposing a fallacy 4 Belief and doubt 5 Believing that and knowing that 6 Knowledge and certainty - the tripartite definition of knowledge 7 True, justified belief 8 Plato: The Theaetetus 9 Plato: Forms 10 The possibility of scepticism and categories of belief 11 Global scepticism 12 The Argument from Authority 13 Valid argument, inference and justification 14 Chain of deductive inferences, self-evident truths 15 Sense experience, empiricism 16 The dialectic method, thesis and antithesis 17 Rationalism and empiricism; the Discourse on the Method 18 The Cogito, Reason and Rational Insight 19 Bertrand Russell, Acquaintance 20 Universals, Forms 21 Scepticism, Existentialism and Faith 22 The evil genius argument 23 Existentialism 24 Soren Kierkegaard - Fear and Trembling - the Absurd 25 Foundation for Knowledge 26 Theory of Knowledge, Epistemology and Metaphysics 27 Rationalism, Mathematics and Logic, Innateness 28 Innate Ideas 29 The a priori 30 Truth by convention, Hume and the Method of Doubt 31 Hume and the distinction between belief and knowledge 32 Hume and the definition of belief 33 Truth as a logical operator on sentences 34 The correspondence theory of truth 35 Wittgenstein: On Certainty 36 Wittgenstein and the coherence theory of truth 37 William James and Pragmatism 38 W.V.O. Quine, pragmatism and the Two Dogmas of Empiricism 39 Postivism and pragmatism 40 Pragmatism and utilitarianism 41 Pragmatism and religiion
|