Knowledge and justification
DOWNLOAD FREE
|
Global scepticism
Equations are omitted for technical reasons - download the original pdf
Sometimes philosophers propose arguments of a global kind that are intended to persuade us that nothing is certain. Here is one famous example. From Descartes First Meditation. "However, I must note that I am only human, and consequently that I habitually sleep, and that in my dreams I have images of those same things, or even of more improbable things, that insane people see when they are awake. How many times have I dreamt during the night that I was in this room by the fire, whereas in fact I was asleep, naked in my bed? It seems certain just now that I am not looking at this paper with closed eyes; that as I shake my head I am not asleep; that when I deliberately and intentionally hold out my hand, I am aware of it. The images presented in dreams are not so clear and distinct as these are. Yet, on reflecting more carefully about all of this, I remember that I have often been deceived in my sleep by similar illusions, and thinking even more closely, I conclude that there is nothing that conclusively and clearly distinguishes between waking and sleeping. I am quite amazed at this, and I feel so astonished that I am almost convinced that I am actually asleep right now!" Arguments of this kind also bring to light a distinction between ordinary doubt and philosophical doubt. In the ordinary course of daily events people rarely consider the possibility that what they take to be real is not real. For example, most people would not consider whether their house has popped out of existence when they have left it, or that they are in fact dreaming, and not really awake. Ordinary doubt is taken up with questions of another kind – for example, a worried parent might not be sure that his child has gone to school, a scientist might doubt the validity of another experimenter's observations. Sometimes philosophers, like Descartes, do raise questions about the things that in the ordinary course of events we might take for granted – hence the distinction between ordinary and philosophical doubt. However, for every philosopher that proposes a philosophical doubt there is another who tries to refute it. Not everyone agrees that doubt is the best starting point for philosophical enquiry. In Western philosophy it has historically occupied a central position, especially since Descartes reaffirmed the possibility of global scepticism and also offered his own unique solution to it.
|
Contents of Knowledge and justification
1 The distinction between knowledge and belief 2 Unsound, invalid, possible world and fallacy 3 Counterexample, exposing a fallacy 4 Belief and doubt 5 Believing that and knowing that 6 Knowledge and certainty - the tripartite definition of knowledge 7 True, justified belief 8 Plato: The Theaetetus 9 Plato: Forms 10 The possibility of scepticism and categories of belief 11 Global scepticism 12 The Argument from Authority 13 Valid argument, inference and justification 14 Chain of deductive inferences, self-evident truths 15 Sense experience, empiricism 16 The dialectic method, thesis and antithesis 17 Rationalism and empiricism; the Discourse on the Method 18 The Cogito, Reason and Rational Insight 19 Bertrand Russell, Acquaintance 20 Universals, Forms 21 Scepticism, Existentialism and Faith 22 The evil genius argument 23 Existentialism 24 Soren Kierkegaard - Fear and Trembling - the Absurd 25 Foundation for Knowledge 26 Theory of Knowledge, Epistemology and Metaphysics 27 Rationalism, Mathematics and Logic, Innateness 28 Innate Ideas 29 The a priori 30 Truth by convention, Hume and the Method of Doubt 31 Hume and the distinction between belief and knowledge 32 Hume and the definition of belief 33 Truth as a logical operator on sentences 34 The correspondence theory of truth 35 Wittgenstein: On Certainty 36 Wittgenstein and the coherence theory of truth 37 William James and Pragmatism 38 W.V.O. Quine, pragmatism and the Two Dogmas of Empiricism 39 Postivism and pragmatism 40 Pragmatism and utilitarianism 41 Pragmatism and religiion
|